Any feedback?
Please rate this page
(literature.php)
(0/150)

BRENDA support

Literature summary for 2.1.1.6 extracted from

  • Patra, N.; Ioannidis, E.I.; Kulik, H.J.
    Computational investigation of the interplay of substrate positioning and reactivity in catechol O-methyltransferase (2016), PLoS ONE, 11, e0161868 .
    View publication on PubMedView publication on EuropePMC

Crystallization (Commentary)

Crystallization (Comment) Organism
bidentate and monodentate binding modes of substrate catecholamine are close in energy but separated by a 7 kcal/mol free energy barrier. The driving force for monodentate catecholate orientations in classical molecular dynamics simulations is derived from stronger electrostatic stabilization afforded by alternate Mg2+ coordination with strongly charged active site carboxylates. Mixed semi-empirical-classical substrate C-O distances (2.7 A) for the bidentate case are in agreement with COMT X-ray crystal structures, as long as charge transfer between the substrates, Mg2+, and surrounding ligands is permitted. Free energy barriers for methyl transfer from bidentate and monodentate catecholate configurations are comparable at around 21-22 kcal/mol Homo sapiens

Organism

Organism UniProt Comment Textmining
Homo sapiens P21964
-
-

Substrates and Products (Substrate)

Substrates Comment Substrates Organism Products Comment (Products) Rev. Reac.
S-adenosyl-L-methionine + catecholamine
-
Homo sapiens S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine + ?
-
?